What is a potential impact of appointing a guardian without exploring alternatives?

Appointing a guardian without exploring alternatives can lead to the restriction of the client’s personal freedoms. This is because the role of a guardian typically involves making decisions on behalf of an individual who may not be able to make those decisions for themselves due to various circumstances, such as mental health issues or incapacitation. Without considering alternatives—such as supported decision-making, power of attorney, or other less restrictive options—the client may find themselves in a situation where they have limited control over their life choices, personal affairs, and overall autonomy. This outcome underscores the importance of conducting a thorough evaluation of all possible support options before resorting to guardianship, which can often be a more drastic measure with significant implications for the individual's independence. Therefore, the answer reflects a critical consideration in the process of ensuring that individuals retain as much freedom and agency as possible while still receiving necessary support.